Madagascar vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square

Madagascar
0.0053 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0041 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
178th
Namibia rank
181st

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square over time

  • Madagascar
  • Namibia
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 178th and Namibia ranks 181st of 194 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 0.005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square, Madagascar or Namibia?
Madagascar, at 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square between Madagascar and Namibia?
0.0012 million USD per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square?
Madagascar ranks 178th and Namibia ranks 181st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/madagascar/namibia/">Madagascar vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.