Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square

Guatemala
0.1255 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.1251 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
90th
Latvia rank
92nd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Latvia
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.1255 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1251 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 92nd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0546 million USD per square kilometre 0.0308 million USD per square kilometre 0.0239 million USD per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0768 million USD per square kilometre 0.0997 million USD per square kilometre 0.023 million USD per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.084 million USD per square kilometre 0.0968 million USD per square kilometre 0.0128 million USD per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.112 million USD per square kilometre 0.1157 million USD per square kilometre 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square, Guatemala or Latvia?
Guatemala, at 0.1255 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1251 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square between Guatemala and Latvia?
0.0004 million USD per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 92nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/latvia/">Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.