Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0322 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
0.0331 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
149th
Kenya rank
148th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kenya
00.10.20.3197019962023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.0331 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0322 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kenya ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Kenya ranks 148th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Kenya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kenya Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre 0.005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 0.0157 million USD per square kilometre 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre 0.0094 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.1314 million USD per square kilometre 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre 0.1204 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.1575 million USD per square kilometre 0.0249 million USD per square kilometre 0.1326 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0296 million USD per square kilometre 0.0319 million USD per square kilometre 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square, Equatorial Guinea or Kenya?
Kenya, at 0.0331 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0322 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square between Equatorial Guinea and Kenya?
0.0009 million USD per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kenya?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kenya rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Kenya ranks 148th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kenya/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.