El Salvador vs Norway: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square

El Salvador
0.2867 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.3064 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
66th
Norway rank
64th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square over time

  • El Salvador
  • Norway
0.050.10.150.20.250.3197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.3064 million USD per square kilometre against 0.2867 million USD per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0197 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

El Salvador ranks 66th and Norway ranks 64th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1042 million USD per square kilometre 0.1041 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0849 million USD per square kilometre 0.1264 million USD per square kilometre 0.0415 million USD per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.1392 million USD per square kilometre 0.1331 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.184 million USD per square kilometre 0.1956 million USD per square kilometre 0.0116 million USD per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.1802 million USD per square kilometre 0.2575 million USD per square kilometre 0.0774 million USD per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.251 million USD per square kilometre 0.2984 million USD per square kilometre 0.0473 million USD per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square, El Salvador or Norway?
Norway, at 0.3064 million USD per square kilometre against 0.2867 million USD per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square between El Salvador and Norway?
0.0197 million USD per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Norway rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square?
El Salvador ranks 66th and Norway ranks 64th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Norway: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/norway/">El Salvador vs Norway: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.