Aruba vs United Kingdom: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square

Aruba
2.62 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
2.38 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
17th
United Kingdom rank
19th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square over time

  • Aruba
  • United Kingdom
0246197019962023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 2.62 million USD per square kilometre against 2.38 million USD per square kilometre in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.24 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Aruba ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 19th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 5 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5416 million USD per square kilometre 0.8353 million USD per square kilometre 0.2937 million USD per square kilometre United Kingdom
1980s 1.36 million USD per square kilometre 0.9736 million USD per square kilometre 0.391 million USD per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 3.08 million USD per square kilometre 1.35 million USD per square kilometre 1.73 million USD per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 4.42 million USD per square kilometre 1.77 million USD per square kilometre 2.65 million USD per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 3.58 million USD per square kilometre 2.03 million USD per square kilometre 1.55 million USD per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 2.97 million USD per square kilometre 2.28 million USD per square kilometre 0.6848 million USD per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square, Aruba or United Kingdom?
Aruba, at 2.62 million USD per square kilometre against 2.38 million USD per square kilometre in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square between Aruba and United Kingdom?
0.24 million USD per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and United Kingdom?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Aruba and United Kingdom rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square?
Aruba ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 19th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs United Kingdom: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/aruba/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/aruba/united-kingdom/">Aruba vs United Kingdom: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.