Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita

Nicaragua
0.0005 million USD per person
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0005 million USD per person
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
145th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
148th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0000.0010.001197019972024

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.0005 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 145th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 148th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0005 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0004 million USD per person Nicaragua
1980s 0.0004 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person Nicaragua
1990s 0.0003 million USD per person 0.0004 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0004 million USD per person 0.0004 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0005 million USD per person 0.0005 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Nicaragua
2020s 0.0005 million USD per person 0.0005 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per capita, Nicaragua or Sao Tome and Principe?
Nicaragua, at 0.0005 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per capita between Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 million USD per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per capita?
Nicaragua ranks 145th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 148th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/nicaragua/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/nicaragua/sao-tome-and-principe/">Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,004 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.