How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita

Ecuador

0.001 million USD per person

in 2024

Namibia

0.001 million USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador rank

117th

Namibia rank

118th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita over time

Ecuador
Namibia

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.001 million USD per person against 0.001 million USD per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0012 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	Ecuador
1980s	0.0013 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0009 million USD per person	Ecuador
1990s	0.0009 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	Ecuador
2000s	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Ecuador
2010s	0.0012 million USD per person	0.0011 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.001 million USD per person	0.0008 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per capita, Ecuador or Namibia?: Ecuador, at 0.001 million USD per person against 0.001 million USD per person in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per capita between Ecuador and Namibia?: 0 million USD per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per capita?: Ecuador ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 195 places, 10,004 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.