Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per

Papua New Guinea
0.0185 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.0243 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
191st
East Timor rank
188th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • East Timor
00.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.0243 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0185 million SLC per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0058 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was East Timor ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 191st and East Timor ranks 188th of 194 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0081 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0048 million SLC per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0093 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 0.0178 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0378 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0201 million SLC per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0.0165 million SLC per square kilometre 0.025 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0085 million SLC per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per, Papua New Guinea or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.0243 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0185 million SLC per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per between Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
0.0058 million SLC per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per?
Papua New Guinea ranks 191st and East Timor ranks 188th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/timor-leste/">Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.