Latvia vs Peru: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per

Latvia
0.1568 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.1664 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
173rd
Peru rank
171st

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per over time

  • Latvia
  • Peru
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.1664 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1568 million SLC per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0096 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Peru ahead.

Latvia ranks 173rd and Peru ranks 171st of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0123 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0205 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0082 million SLC per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0.0664 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0387 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0277 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0861 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1052 million SLC per square kilometre 0.019 million SLC per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0.1295 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1515 million SLC per square kilometre 0.022 million SLC per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per, Latvia or Peru?
Peru, at 0.1664 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1568 million SLC per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per between Latvia and Peru?
0.0096 million SLC per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per?
Latvia ranks 173rd and Peru ranks 171st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Peru: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/latvia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/latvia/peru/">Latvia vs Peru: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.