Cuba vs Latvia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per

Cuba
0.1436 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.1568 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
174th
Latvia rank
173rd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per over time

  • Cuba
  • Latvia
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.1568 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1436 million SLC per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 174th and Latvia ranks 173rd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0123 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0118 million SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0406 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0664 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0258 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0737 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0861 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0125 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.1065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1295 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0231 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per, Cuba or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.1568 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1436 million SLC per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per between Cuba and Latvia?
0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per?
Cuba ranks 174th and Latvia ranks 173rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Latvia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/cuba/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/cuba/latvia/">Cuba vs Latvia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.