Chile vs Nigeria: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per

Chile
90.44 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
91.01 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
21st
Nigeria rank
20th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per over time

  • Chile
  • Nigeria
020406080100197019962023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 91.01 million SLC per square kilometre against 90.44 million SLC per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.57 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nigeria ahead.

Chile ranks 21st and Nigeria ranks 20th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nigeria Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0439 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0545 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0106 million SLC per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 1.02 million SLC per square kilometre 0.137 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8799 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
1990s 9.23 million SLC per square kilometre 1.17 million SLC per square kilometre 8.06 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
2000s 21.03 million SLC per square kilometre 5.92 million SLC per square kilometre 15.1 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 50.75 million SLC per square kilometre 17.67 million SLC per square kilometre 33.08 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 79.15 million SLC per square kilometre 68.79 million SLC per square kilometre 10.36 million SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per, Chile or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 91.01 million SLC per square kilometre against 90.44 million SLC per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per between Chile and Nigeria?
0.57 million SLC per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per?
Chile ranks 21st and Nigeria ranks 20th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nigeria: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/chile/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/chile/nigeria/">Chile vs Nigeria: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.