Belarus vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per

Belarus
0.2326 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2418 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
163rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
162nd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.10.20.30.4197019962023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.2418 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2326 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0092 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Belarus ranks 163rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 162nd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0661 million SLC per square kilometre 0.066 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0099 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2116 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2017 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.1154 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1577 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0423 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.2005 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1984 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per, Belarus or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.2418 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2326 million SLC per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per between Belarus and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0092 million SLC per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turks and Caicos Islands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, per?
Belarus ranks 163rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/belarus/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/belarus/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Belarus vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.