Malaysia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual

Malaysia
13.18 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
12.75 % change on previous year
in 2024
Malaysia rank
39th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
40th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual over time

  • Malaysia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50050100150197119972024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 13.18 % change on previous year against 12.75 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.43 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 39th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 230 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 22.45 % change on previous year 20.39 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year Malaysia
1980s 11.08 % change on previous year 28.84 % change on previous year 17.75 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 10.09 % change on previous year 59.86 % change on previous year 49.76 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 9.6 % change on previous year 14.22 % change on previous year 4.63 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 8.47 % change on previous year 12.63 % change on previous year 4.17 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 3.2 % change on previous year 25.84 % change on previous year 22.65 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual, Malaysia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Malaysia, at 13.18 % change on previous year against 12.75 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual between Malaysia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.43 % change on previous year, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sao Tome and Principe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual?
Malaysia ranks 39th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 230 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/malaysia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/malaysia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malaysia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 11,310 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.