Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual

Equatorial Guinea
0.7766 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
1.22 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
195th
Sweden rank
192nd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sweden
-1000100200300197119972024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 1.22 % change on previous year against 0.7766 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.4434 % change on previous year.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.6 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Sweden ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 195th and Sweden ranks 192nd of 230 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 16.75 % change on previous year 10.12 % change on previous year 6.63 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1980s 33.7 % change on previous year 12.19 % change on previous year 21.51 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1990s 55.45 % change on previous year 1.97 % change on previous year 53.48 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 29.75 % change on previous year 4.52 % change on previous year 25.23 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s -11.87 % change on previous year 5.08 % change on previous year 16.95 % change on previous year Sweden
2020s 5.38 % change on previous year 5.64 % change on previous year 0.2623 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual, Equatorial Guinea or Sweden?
Sweden, at 1.22 % change on previous year against 0.7766 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual between Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
0.4434 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 195th and Sweden ranks 192nd of 230 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/sweden/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 11,310 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.