Central African Republic vs Iceland: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual

Central African Republic
13.64 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iceland
13.21 % change on previous year
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
37th
Iceland rank
38th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Iceland
-1000100200300197119972024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 13.64 % change on previous year against 13.21 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0.43 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Iceland ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 37th and Iceland ranks 38th of 230 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 7.63 % change on previous year 40.57 % change on previous year 32.94 % change on previous year Iceland
1980s 10.59 % change on previous year 39.05 % change on previous year 28.46 % change on previous year Iceland
1990s 12.7 % change on previous year 9.13 % change on previous year 3.57 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2000s 5.19 % change on previous year 7.41 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year Iceland
2010s 26.86 % change on previous year 10.04 % change on previous year 16.82 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2020s 7.42 % change on previous year 13.78 % change on previous year 6.35 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual, Central African Republic or Iceland?
Central African Republic, at 13.64 % change on previous year against 13.21 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual between Central African Republic and Iceland?
0.43 % change on previous year, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, annual?
Central African Republic ranks 37th and Iceland ranks 38th of 230 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Iceland: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/iceland/">Central African Republic vs Iceland: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 11,310 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.