China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

China, Hong Kong SAR
485,106 million SLC
in 2024
Ethiopia
522,325 million SLC
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
67th
Ethiopia rank
65th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Ethiopia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019972024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 522,325 million SLC against 485,106 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 37,219 million SLC.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 67th and Ethiopia ranks 65th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 328,405 million SLC 26,310 million SLC 302,095 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 397,783 million SLC 66,364 million SLC 331,419 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 528,778 million SLC 417,547 million SLC 111,231 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 454,217 million SLC 515,465 million SLC 61,248 million SLC Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, China, Hong Kong SAR or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 522,325 million SLC against 485,106 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
37,219 million SLC, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 67th and Ethiopia ranks 65th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 10,794 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).