Belarus vs Ecuador: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Belarus
22,967 million SLC
in 2024
Ecuador
18,593 million SLC
in 2024
Belarus rank
122nd
Ecuador rank
125th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
10.0k20.0k30.0k197019972024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 22,967 million SLC against 18,593 million SLC in Ecuador, a difference of 4,374 million SLC.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 122nd and Ecuador ranks 125th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 7,709 million SLC 10,276 million SLC 2,567 million SLC Ecuador
2000s 13,716 million SLC 10,807 million SLC 2,909 million SLC Belarus
2010s 27,652 million SLC 20,102 million SLC 7,550 million SLC Belarus
2020s 22,000 million SLC 18,108 million SLC 3,892 million SLC Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Belarus or Ecuador?
Belarus, at 22,967 million SLC against 18,593 million SLC in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Belarus and Ecuador?
4,374 million SLC, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Belarus ranks 122nd and Ecuador ranks 125th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ecuador: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/belarus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/belarus/ecuador/">Belarus vs Ecuador: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 10,794 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).