Tunisia vs Zambia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Tunisia
0.0952 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
171st
Zambia rank
174th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zambia
00.0250.050.0750.10.125197019962023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0952 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0117 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 174th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0384 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0486 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0102 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0583 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0157 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0425 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.066 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0572 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0965 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0339 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0626 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.1216 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0775 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0441 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.1018 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0798 million SLC per square kilometre 0.022 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Tunisia or Zambia?
Tunisia, at 0.0952 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Tunisia and Zambia?
0.0117 million SLC per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Tunisia ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 174th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zambia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/tunisia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/tunisia/zambia/">Tunisia vs Zambia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.