Namibia vs Suriname: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Namibia
0.0527 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0554 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
183rd
Suriname rank
181st

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
00.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0554 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0527 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Namibia ranks 183rd and Suriname ranks 181st of 194 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0078 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0116 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0038 million SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0063 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0102 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0038 million SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0096 million SLC per square kilometre 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0044 million SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0204 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0323 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0119 million SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0402 million SLC per square kilometre 0.05 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0098 million SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.034 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0538 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0197 million SLC per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0554 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0527 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Namibia and Suriname?
0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Namibia ranks 183rd and Suriname ranks 181st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.