Lesotho vs Panama: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Lesotho
0.3088 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.331 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
142nd
Panama rank
140th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Lesotho
  • Panama
00.10.20.3197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.331 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.3088 million SLC per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0222 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

Lesotho ranks 142nd and Panama ranks 140th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Panama Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0433 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0238 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0195 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 0.1024 million SLC per square kilometre 0.024 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0783 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 0.2065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0439 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1626 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 0.1541 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0758 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0783 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 0.2583 million SLC per square kilometre 0.262 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0037 million SLC per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.286 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2474 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0386 million SLC per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Lesotho or Panama?
Panama, at 0.331 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.3088 million SLC per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Lesotho and Panama?
0.0222 million SLC per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Panama?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Lesotho ranks 142nd and Panama ranks 140th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Panama: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/lesotho/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/lesotho/panama/">Lesotho vs Panama: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.