Iceland vs Thailand: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Iceland
7.06 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
7.44 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
59th
Thailand rank
57th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Iceland
  • Thailand
02468197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 7.44 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.06 million SLC per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.38 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 59th and Thailand ranks 57th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 1.97 million SLC per square kilometre 1.06 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9118 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 2.43 million SLC per square kilometre 2.09 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3399 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 2.68 million SLC per square kilometre 5.36 million SLC per square kilometre 2.68 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 4.86 million SLC per square kilometre 4.57 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2886 million SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 4.26 million SLC per square kilometre 6.57 million SLC per square kilometre 2.3 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 6.31 million SLC per square kilometre 7.24 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9294 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Iceland or Thailand?
Thailand, at 7.44 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.06 million SLC per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Iceland and Thailand?
0.38 million SLC per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Thailand rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Iceland ranks 59th and Thailand ranks 57th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Thailand: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/iceland/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/iceland/thailand/">Iceland vs Thailand: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.