Guatemala vs Malaysia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Guatemala
0.9605 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.9561 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
117th
Malaysia rank
118th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malaysia
00.20.40.60.81197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.9605 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.9561 million SLC per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0044 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 117th and Malaysia ranks 118th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2659 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0637 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2022 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.2572 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1521 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1051 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.3853 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4189 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0336 million SLC per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.5875 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4854 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1021 million SLC per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.6433 million SLC per square kilometre 0.873 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2297 million SLC per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.8572 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8919 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0346 million SLC per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Guatemala or Malaysia?
Guatemala, at 0.9605 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.9561 million SLC per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Guatemala and Malaysia?
0.0044 million SLC per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malaysia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malaysia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Guatemala ranks 117th and Malaysia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malaysia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/guatemala/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/guatemala/malaysia/">Guatemala vs Malaysia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.