Egypt vs Portugal: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Egypt
0.4291 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
0.4449 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
135th
Portugal rank
132nd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Egypt
  • Portugal
00.20.40.6197019962023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.4449 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.4291 million SLC per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.0158 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Egypt ranks 135th and Portugal ranks 132nd of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0554 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1831 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1278 million SLC per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.1838 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2201 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0363 million SLC per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.2007 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3458 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1451 million SLC per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.2995 million SLC per square kilometre 0.448 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1485 million SLC per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.3846 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3384 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0463 million SLC per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.4562 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4189 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0374 million SLC per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Egypt or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.4449 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.4291 million SLC per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Egypt and Portugal?
0.0158 million SLC per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Portugal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Egypt ranks 135th and Portugal ranks 132nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Portugal: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/portugal/">Egypt vs Portugal: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.