Ecuador vs Zambia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Ecuador
0.0778 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
176th
Zambia rank
174th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zambia
00.020.040.060.080.1197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0778 million SLC per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 176th and Zambia ranks 174th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0317 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0486 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0169 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0415 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0157 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0257 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.0377 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0289 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0435 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0339 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0096 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0809 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0775 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0724 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0798 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Ecuador or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0835 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0778 million SLC per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Ecuador and Zambia?
0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Ecuador ranks 176th and Zambia ranks 174th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zambia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/ecuador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/ecuador/zambia/">Ecuador vs Zambia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.