Costa Rica vs Uganda: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Costa Rica
127.57 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
170.72 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
12th
Uganda rank
10th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Uganda
050100150197019962023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 170.72 million SLC per square kilometre against 127.57 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 43.15 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 12th and Uganda ranks 10th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 17.89 million SLC per square kilometre 8.33 million SLC per square kilometre 9.56 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 20.75 million SLC per square kilometre 9.17 million SLC per square kilometre 11.58 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 42.9 million SLC per square kilometre 19.25 million SLC per square kilometre 23.64 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 72.62 million SLC per square kilometre 47.75 million SLC per square kilometre 24.87 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 107.48 million SLC per square kilometre 113.37 million SLC per square kilometre 5.89 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 117.02 million SLC per square kilometre 159.46 million SLC per square kilometre 42.44 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Costa Rica or Uganda?
Uganda, at 170.72 million SLC per square kilometre against 127.57 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Costa Rica and Uganda?
43.15 million SLC per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Uganda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Costa Rica ranks 12th and Uganda ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Uganda: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/costa-rica/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/costa-rica/uganda/">Costa Rica vs Uganda: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.