Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Costa Rica
127.57 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
97.48 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
12th
Rwanda rank
15th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Rwanda
050100150197019962023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 127.57 million SLC per square kilometre against 97.48 million SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 30.09 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 194 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 17.89 million SLC per square kilometre 2.76 million SLC per square kilometre 15.14 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 20.75 million SLC per square kilometre 7.37 million SLC per square kilometre 13.37 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 42.9 million SLC per square kilometre 5.93 million SLC per square kilometre 36.96 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 72.62 million SLC per square kilometre 17.01 million SLC per square kilometre 55.6 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 107.48 million SLC per square kilometre 54.01 million SLC per square kilometre 53.47 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 117.02 million SLC per square kilometre 88.34 million SLC per square kilometre 28.68 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
Costa Rica, at 127.57 million SLC per square kilometre against 97.48 million SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
30.09 million SLC per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Costa Rica ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/costa-rica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/costa-rica/rwanda/">Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.