Costa Rica vs Hungary: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Costa Rica
127.57 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
110.4 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
12th
Hungary rank
14th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Hungary
0255075100125197019962023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 127.57 million SLC per square kilometre against 110.4 million SLC per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 17.17 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hungary ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 12th and Hungary ranks 14th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Hungary Difference Ahead
1970s 17.89 million SLC per square kilometre 43.66 million SLC per square kilometre 25.77 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 20.75 million SLC per square kilometre 47.84 million SLC per square kilometre 27.1 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 42.9 million SLC per square kilometre 47.23 million SLC per square kilometre 4.33 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 72.62 million SLC per square kilometre 75.98 million SLC per square kilometre 3.36 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 107.48 million SLC per square kilometre 84.49 million SLC per square kilometre 22.98 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 117.02 million SLC per square kilometre 115.25 million SLC per square kilometre 1.77 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Costa Rica or Hungary?
Costa Rica, at 127.57 million SLC per square kilometre against 110.4 million SLC per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Costa Rica and Hungary?
17.17 million SLC per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Hungary?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Hungary rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Costa Rica ranks 12th and Hungary ranks 14th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Hungary: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/costa-rica/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/costa-rica/hungary/">Costa Rica vs Hungary: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.