Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Barbados
4.18 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands
4 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
72nd
Cayman Islands rank
75th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Barbados
  • Cayman Islands
01234197019962023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 4.18 million SLC per square kilometre against 4 million SLC per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.18 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 72nd and Cayman Islands ranks 75th of 194 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Cayman Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 1.82 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2735 million SLC per square kilometre 1.54 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 2.05 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6873 million SLC per square kilometre 1.36 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 2.34 million SLC per square kilometre 1.34 million SLC per square kilometre 1.01 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 3.55 million SLC per square kilometre 2.1 million SLC per square kilometre 1.45 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 3.93 million SLC per square kilometre 2.38 million SLC per square kilometre 1.55 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 3.94 million SLC per square kilometre 3.69 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2446 million SLC per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Barbados or Cayman Islands?
Barbados, at 4.18 million SLC per square kilometre against 4 million SLC per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Barbados and Cayman Islands?
0.18 million SLC per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cayman Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Cayman Islands rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Barbados ranks 72nd and Cayman Islands ranks 75th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/barbados/cayman-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-square/barbados/cayman-islands/">Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.