Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015

Equatorial Guinea
0.2767 million SLC per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.2196 million SLC per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
30th
Serbia rank
33rd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
01234197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2767 million SLC per person against 0.2196 million SLC per person in Serbia, a difference of 0.0571 million SLC per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 194 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4194 million SLC per person 0.0421 million SLC per person 0.3773 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 2.26 million SLC per person 0.079 million SLC per person 2.18 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.96 million SLC per person 0.1131 million SLC per person 1.85 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.2752 million SLC per person 0.1938 million SLC per person 0.0814 million SLC per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2767 million SLC per person against 0.2196 million SLC per person in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015 between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0.0571 million SLC per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value standard local currency, 2015?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 33rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,949 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.