Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- Serbia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.7% against 16.3% in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Serbia ranks 50th and Turkmenistan ranks 53rd of 106 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Serbia or Turkmenistan?
- Serbia, at 16.7% against 16.3% in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 0.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Turkmenistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- Serbia ranks 50th and Turkmenistan ranks 53rd of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.