Malaysia vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- Malaysia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.7% against 16.5% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 52nd and Serbia ranks 50th of 106 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Malaysia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 16.7% against 16.5% in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Malaysia and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- Malaysia ranks 52nd and Serbia ranks 50th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.