Lebanon vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- Lebanon
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4.5% against 1.2% in Lebanon, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.7 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 106 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.8% | 17.8% | 9.0% | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 19.9% | 5.2% | 14.7% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 21.3% | -6.0% | 27.3% | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 3.5% | 4.9% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Lebanon or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4.5% against 1.2% in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Lebanon and Zimbabwe?
- 3.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- Lebanon ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.