Guam vs Upper middle income: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- Guam
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Upper middle income currently reports 30.0% against 29.1% in Guam, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Upper middle income has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 6th and Upper middle income ranks 4th of 106 countries.
Upper middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Guam or Upper middle income?
- Upper middle income, at 30.0% against 29.1% in Guam as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Guam and Upper middle income?
- 0.9%, with Upper middle income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Upper middle income?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2006.
- How do Guam and Upper middle income rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- Guam ranks 6th and Upper middle income ranks 4th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.