Curaçao vs Guam: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- Curaçao
- Guam
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 31.0% against 29.1% in Guam, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Curaçao's figure about 1.1 times Guam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curaçao ahead.
Curaçao ranks 4th and Guam ranks 6th of 106 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Curaçao or Guam?
- Curaçao, at 31.0% against 29.1% in Guam as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Curaçao and Guam?
- 1.9%, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Guam?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curaçao and Guam rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- Curaçao ranks 4th and Guam ranks 6th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.