China vs Curaçao: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- China
- Curaçao
How they compare
China currently reports 33.5% against 31.0% in Curaçao, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Curaçao's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 2nd and Curaçao ranks 4th of 106 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, China or Curaçao?
- China, at 33.5% against 31.0% in Curaçao as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between China and Curaçao?
- 2.5%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Curaçao?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do China and Curaçao rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- China ranks 2nd and Curaçao ranks 4th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.