Korea vs Viet Nam: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices
Korea
478,488
in 2019
Viet Nam
1.20 million
in 2019
Korea rank
5th
Viet Nam rank
4th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices over time
- Korea
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 1.20 million against 478,488 in Korea, a difference of 721,252.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 2.5 times Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Korea ahead.
Korea ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 174 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2,930 | 0.4408 | 2,929 | Korea |
| 1980s | 22,292 | 490.58 | 21,802 | Korea |
| 1990s | 116,001 | 42,374 | 73,627 | Korea |
| 2000s | 232,786 | 234,135 | 1,350 | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 410,163 | 747,428 | 337,265 | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices, Korea or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 1.20 million against 478,488 in Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices between Korea and Viet Nam?
- 721,252, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Viet Nam?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
- How do Korea and Viet Nam rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices?
- Korea ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.