Democratic Republic of Congo vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation, Private … square kilometre Domestic

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0071 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Malta
0.0065 units per square kilometre
in 2017
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
52nd
Malta rank
54th

Gross fixed capital formation, Private … square kilometre Domestic over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Malta
00.0020.0040.0060.008197019942019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.0071 units per square kilometre against 0.0065 units per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0006 units per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 52nd and Malta ranks 54th of 171 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0027 units per square kilometre 0.0025 units per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0024 units per square kilometre 0.0046 units per square kilometre 0.0023 units per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices, Democratic Republic of Congo or Malta?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.0071 units per square kilometre against 0.0065 units per square kilometre in Malta as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices between Democratic Republic of Congo and Malta?
0.0006 units per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Malta?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Malta rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 52nd and Malta ranks 54th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-prices-domestic-currency-per-square/congo-dem-rep/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-prices-domestic-currency-per-square/congo-dem-rep/malta/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Malta: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 7,663 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.