Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross fixed capital formation, Private … square kilometre Domestic

Cape Verde
0.0153 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
0.0138 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
39th
Equatorial Guinea rank
42nd

Gross fixed capital formation, Private … square kilometre Domestic over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.020.040.060.08197019942019

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.0153 units per square kilometre against 0.0138 units per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0015 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 42nd of 171 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 0.0028 units per square kilometre 0.0038 units per square kilometre 0.001 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0067 units per square kilometre 0.0238 units per square kilometre 0.0171 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0116 units per square kilometre 0.0286 units per square kilometre 0.017 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
Cape Verde, at 0.0153 units per square kilometre against 0.0138 units per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0015 units per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, current prices?
Cape Verde ranks 39th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 42nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-prices-domestic-currency-per-square/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-prices-domestic-currency-per-square/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/">Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 7,663 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.