Macao vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector

Macao
30.52 billion current LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
37.29 billion current LCU
in 2024
Macao rank
70th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time

  • Macao
  • Zimbabwe
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B197920022025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 37.29 billion current LCU against 30.52 billion current LCU in Macao, a difference of 6.77 billion current LCU.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Macao's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 105 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 22.61 billion current LCU 114,800 current LCU 22.61 billion current LCU Macao
2010s 52.93 billion current LCU 257,140 current LCU 52.93 billion current LCU Macao
2020s 35.88 billion current LCU 8.40 billion current LCU 27.48 billion current LCU Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Macao or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 37.29 billion current LCU against 30.52 billion current LCU in Macao as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Macao and Zimbabwe?
6.77 billion current LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Macao and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
Macao ranks 70th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-lcu/macao-sar-china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-lcu/macao-sar-china/zimbabwe/">Macao vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
105 places, 3,078 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.