China vs Lebanon: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector

China
43.34 trillion current LCU
in 2023
Lebanon
28.12 trillion current LCU
in 2024
China rank
5th
Lebanon rank
8th

Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time

  • China
  • Lebanon
010.0T20.0T30.0T40.0T199020072024

How they compare

China currently reports 43.34 trillion current LCU against 28.12 trillion current LCU in Lebanon, a difference of 15.22 trillion current LCU.

That makes China's figure about 1.5 times Lebanon's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lebanon ahead.

China ranks 5th and Lebanon ranks 8th of 105 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Lebanon Difference Ahead
1990s 1.84 trillion current LCU 4.83 trillion current LCU 2.99 trillion current LCU Lebanon
2000s 6.73 trillion current LCU 7.11 trillion current LCU 379.38 billion current LCU Lebanon
2010s 25.88 trillion current LCU 15.22 trillion current LCU 10.66 trillion current LCU China
2020s 41.10 trillion current LCU 15.57 trillion current LCU 25.53 trillion current LCU China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, China or Lebanon?
China, at 43.34 trillion current LCU against 28.12 trillion current LCU in Lebanon as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between China and Lebanon?
15.22 trillion current LCU, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lebanon?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China and Lebanon rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
China ranks 5th and Lebanon ranks 8th of 105 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Lebanon: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-lcu/china/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-current-lcu/china/lebanon/">China vs Lebanon: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
105 places, 3,078 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.