Belarus vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation, private sector
Gross fixed capital formation, private sector over time
- Belarus
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 22.00 billion current LCU against 21.89 billion current LCU in Belarus, a difference of 103.60 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Belarus ranks 73rd and Sierra Leone ranks 71st of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.16 million current LCU | 27.05 million current LCU | 16.89 million current LCU | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 1.70 billion current LCU | 426.88 million current LCU | 1.28 billion current LCU | Belarus |
| 2010s | 13.70 billion current LCU | 4.07 billion current LCU | 9.63 billion current LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, Belarus or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 22.00 billion current LCU against 21.89 billion current LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector between Belarus and Sierra Leone?
- 103.60 million current LCU, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sierra Leone?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector?
- Belarus ranks 73rd and Sierra Leone ranks 71st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation, private sector (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private investment covers outlays by the private sector (including private nonprofit agencies) on additions to its fixed domestic assets. Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.