Serbia vs Yemen: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Serbia
17.18
in 2019
Yemen
16.75
in 2019
Serbia rank
80th
Yemen rank
81st
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Serbia
- Yemen
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 17.18 against 16.75 in Yemen, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 80th and Yemen ranks 81st of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 3 and Yemen in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.61 | 1.37 | 2.24 | Serbia |
| 1970s | 5.34 | 2.03 | 3.31 | Serbia |
| 1980s | 7.91 | 2.97 | 4.93 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 6 | 8.65 | 2.65 | Yemen |
| 2000s | 9.73 | 14.2 | 4.47 | Yemen |
| 2010s | 13.04 | 15.32 | 2.29 | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Serbia or Yemen?
- Serbia, at 17.18 against 16.75 in Yemen as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Serbia and Yemen?
- 0.43, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Yemen?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Serbia and Yemen rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Serbia ranks 80th and Yemen ranks 81st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.