Nepal vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Nepal
18.9
in 2019
Serbia
17.18
in 2019
Nepal rank
77th
Serbia rank
80th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Nepal
- Serbia
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 18.9 against 17.18 in Serbia, a difference of 1.72.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Serbia ahead.
Nepal ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 80th of 173 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4491 | 3.61 | 3.16 | Serbia |
| 1970s | 0.9056 | 5.34 | 4.44 | Serbia |
| 1980s | 1.76 | 7.91 | 6.15 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 3.6 | 6 | 2.4 | Serbia |
| 2000s | 6.78 | 9.73 | 2.96 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 12.08 | 13.04 | 0.9547 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Nepal or Serbia?
- Nepal, at 18.9 against 17.18 in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Nepal and Serbia?
- 1.72, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Serbia?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Nepal ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 80th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.