Hong Kong, China vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices

Hong Kong, China
59.42
in 2019
Kazakhstan
62.46
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
51st
Kazakhstan rank
49th

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Kazakhstan
020406080196019892019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 62.46 against 59.42 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 3.04.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Kazakhstan ranks 49th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1960s 5.9 14.08 8.18 Kazakhstan
1970s 10.74 20.84 10.1 Kazakhstan
1980s 23.6 30.85 7.25 Kazakhstan
1990s 45.22 21.24 23.98 Hong Kong, China
2000s 54.38 21.51 32.88 Hong Kong, China
2010s 67.29 45.13 22.15 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Hong Kong, China or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 62.46 against 59.42 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Hong Kong, China and Kazakhstan?
3.04, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Kazakhstan?
60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Kazakhstan ranks 49th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp/hong-kong-sar-china/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp/hong-kong-sar-china/kazakhstan/">Hong Kong, China vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
173 places, 10,290 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.