China vs India: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
China
5,444
in 2019
India
1,680
in 2019
China rank
1st
India rank
3rd
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- China
- India
How they compare
China currently reports 5,444 against 1,680 in India, a difference of 3,764.
That makes China's figure about 3.2 times India's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was India ahead.
China ranks 1st and India ranks 3rd of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and India in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.45 | 53.44 | 42 | India |
| 1970s | 19.2 | 66.42 | 47.22 | India |
| 1980s | 43.51 | 74.79 | 31.27 | India |
| 1990s | 140.29 | 211.23 | 70.94 | India |
| 2000s | 1,036 | 597.52 | 438.84 | China |
| 2010s | 4,071 | 1,371 | 2,701 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, China or India?
- China, at 5,444 against 1,680 in India as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between China and India?
- 3,764, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and India?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do China and India rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- China ranks 1st and India ranks 3rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.