Cambodia vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Cambodia
10.4
in 2019
Latvia
10.13
in 2019
Cambodia rank
92nd
Latvia rank
93rd
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Cambodia
- Latvia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 10.4 against 10.13 in Latvia, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3066 | 0.9635 | 0.6569 | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0.2758 | 1.43 | 1.15 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 0.2259 | 2.11 | 1.89 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 0.6134 | 3.2 | 2.58 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 2.49 | 9.67 | 7.18 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.33 | 8.78 | 2.45 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Cambodia or Latvia?
- Cambodia, at 10.4 against 10.13 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Cambodia and Latvia?
- 0.27, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Latvia?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Cambodia ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.