Ecuador vs Mauritius: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices

Ecuador
3.58 % change on previous year
in 2019
Mauritius
3.88 % change on previous year
in 2019
Ecuador rank
90th
Mauritius rank
87th

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritius
-50050100150196119902019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 3.88 % change on previous year against 3.58 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 0.3 % change on previous year.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Ecuador ranks 90th and Mauritius ranks 87th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 5.09 % change on previous year 4 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 7.7 % change on previous year 14.63 % change on previous year 6.93 % change on previous year Mauritius
1980s -1.95 % change on previous year 5.36 % change on previous year 7.31 % change on previous year Mauritius
1990s -1.78 % change on previous year 7.95 % change on previous year 9.73 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s 6.36 % change on previous year 5.61 % change on previous year 0.7549 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 7.41 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year 6.4 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Ecuador or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 3.88 % change on previous year against 3.58 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Ecuador and Mauritius?
0.3 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritius?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Mauritius rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Ecuador ranks 90th and Mauritius ranks 87th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritius: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-5/ecuador/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-5/ecuador/mauritius/">Ecuador vs Mauritius: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 10,108 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.