Nepal vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Nepal
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
New Zealand
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Nepal rank
81st
New Zealand rank
78th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Nepal
  • New Zealand
0000196119902019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 78th of 170 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Nepal or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Nepal and New Zealand?
0 units per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Zealand?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Nepal and New Zealand rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Nepal ranks 81st and New Zealand ranks 78th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/nepal/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/nepal/new-zealand/">Nepal vs New Zealand: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.