Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Namibia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0 units per square kilometre
in 2008
Namibia rank
163rd
Zimbabwe rank
164th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119902019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Namibia ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 170 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
0 units per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
48 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2008.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Namibia ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.