Mexico vs North Macedonia: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Mexico
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
North Macedonia
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2017
Mexico rank
68th
North Macedonia rank
69th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Mexico
  • North Macedonia
0000196119902019

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 68th and North Macedonia ranks 69th of 170 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Mexico or North Macedonia?
Mexico, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Mexico and North Macedonia?
0 units per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Mexico and North Macedonia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Mexico ranks 68th and North Macedonia ranks 69th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs North Macedonia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/mexico/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/mexico/north-macedonia/">Mexico vs North Macedonia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.